Home > Case Studies > Aurora
Mayor Paul Tauer said his city was tired of being a “dumping ground” for shoddy housing. In 2000, the city did something about it, passing an ordinance requiring all new homes to have facades of at least 50% masonry (brick, stone, manufactured stone, or cementitious stucco). Councilmember (and the Mayor’s son) Ed Tauer said, “I think it sends a pretty strong message to builders and, more importantly, to buyers that Aurora’s going to be a quality area.” Countering claims that the masonry requirement will make housing unaffordable for lower income buyers, city officials said that adding three to six percent more to the cost of a new home would pay off down the road in lower maintenance costs, higher resale values, and an improved community image. Since the standard applies to all builders, many officials now believe that the competitive marketplace has kept the price of new homes steady, despite the addition of brick and stone. On the process of choosing the exact figure for the masonry requirement, Mayor Tauer notes, “It’s a balancing act. It’s not easy to pick a perfect number, but everybody wants to stop bad development. Everybody’s in favor of some kind of masonry standard.” Adding a long-term perspective, Ann Sullivan, executive director of the Rocky Mountain Masonry Institute, said, “I think you can look to Denver’s history to see what brick has done for communities. You look at popular neighborhoods like Washington Park, Bonnie Brae, Park Hill. Despite boom and bust times, those neighborhoods retained their good looks and quality. I think that’s what Aurora can expect.” Just The Facts
|
|||||||||||||||
